      |
 |
|
National Animal
Identification System
Update: A recent announcement implied
that USDA is giving up on NAIS however it was immediately followed
up by statements that they were simply going to re-align it and work
with the states to implement a better process. In my opinion
the only good NAIS program is a dead NAIS program and many small
farmers see it the same way.
Do you want
to choose where your food comes from and how it was raised? If
so, please read on.
I have been
reluctant to post on this subject because I felt that politics did
not have a place on this web site. But recent developments
have caused me to reconsider. I feel it's essential for
everyone to be educated on the National Animal Identification System
(NAIS) proposal so they can judge it and make up their own minds as
to whether it should be implemented. I am strongly opposed to
it. But I will try to layout the facts and provide links to
further material in as unbiased a manner as possible.
What is
NAIS?
NAIS is a
new regulation the USDA is
trying to implement that says anyone who owns even just one
animal (excepting cats and dogs) has to do the following:
 |
Register their "premise"
(home, farm, stable) in a national database and pay an annual
fee. The amount of the fee has not yet been specified. Once in this database the property
can never be released even if in the future you own no animals.
And you pay the fee even if you own no animals. Anyone who
buys your property must continue to pay the fee. |
 |
Agree to
allow the USDA to enter your "premise" at any time to
"inspect" your animals and confiscate them if they
determine it necessary. All without warrant.
|
 |
Place an id tag (ear tag or RFID id) on each individual animal
you own and
register that animal in a national database. |
 |
Report to the national database every significant event in each
individual animal's life including:
- birth
- anytime it leaves the "premise" including vet
visits, shows, exhibits, and trail rides
- anytime it arrives at a vet office, show, exhibit, organized trail
ride (this will actually be done for you by the event organizer who
now must report all animals participating)
- vet appointments on your property (actually your vet will have to
do this and rat on you if s/he sees an animal that is not identified
in the DB)
- death |
 |
In
addition to the above requirements for animal owners, those
involved in the animal industry such as your vet, hay dealer, and
feed store are going to have to report the "premises" they do
business with - and of course that means reporting on those they do
business with who don't have an ID. |
The USDA will tell you
that NAIS is necessary to control animal diseases
such as mad cow disease (BSE), foot and mouth disease, scrapies, and
equine infectious anemia (EIA). But the facts are:
Mad Cow
Disease or BSE
 |
There
have been three cases of mad cow disease in the United States.
One was a Washington state cow that had been imported from
Canada. Another was a Texas born cow and the third was an
Alabama cow. |
 |
USDA's
own analysis concluded that the prevalence of mad cow disease is
extremely low. Their analysis states there are probably
four to seven undetected cases of the disease in the United
States. |
 |
Mad cow
disease can be eliminated by proper feeding practices.
Don't feed sheep, pig, and cow parts to cows and the disease
will be eliminated. Feeding these rendered animal products
to cows is now illegal. |
 |
Random
beef carcasses are tested in slaughter facilities to prevent
infected beef from entering the food supply. |
 |
In July
2006 the USDA reduced it's testing for mad cow disease in
slaughter facilities by 90% Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns
explained this reduction by saying: "It's
time that our surveillance efforts reflect what we now know is a
very, very low level of BSE in the United States. There is
no significant BSE problem in the United States, and after all
of this surveillance, I am able to say there never was."
Reference article.
|
 |
Prior to
July/Aug 2006, 1,000 tests for mad cow disease were conducted in
slaughter plants every day representing approximately 1% of the
cattle slaughtered. The cost was $1M per week.
|
 |
After
August 2006 the level of testing was 110 tests a day.
|
 |
Consumer
groups advocate 100% testing of beef. They estimate the
cost to be between $30 - $50 per cow. |
 |
European
standards require testing only of animals over 30 months of age
because age is associated with infection. In the US this
is approximately 10 million cows. The additional cost
would add an estimated 10 cents a pound to the price of beef.
|
 |
In
response to the request for 100% testing Mr. Johanns' said that
the real key to food safety was removing at slaughter the cattle
parts known to carry mad cow disease. |
 |
Japan is
the largest US beef importer and they have demanded that all
beef be tested. Keith Collins, USDA's Chief Economist,
told the Senate Appropriations committee that the USDA considers
Japan's demands "unreasonable". |
 |
One beef
producer,
Creekstone Farms, wants to test
100% of their beef carcasses in their own testing lab and at
their own cost to meet consumer requests. The USDA has
been fighting them in court to prevent them from testing.
The USDA contends their testing of 1% of cattle slaughtered is
adequate to protect consumers from BSE. The USDA has not
stated their motives for denying an independent company from
going above and beyond the current required testing in order to
satisfy their customers. |
Foot and
Mouth Disease
 |
There
has not been an incidence of Foot and Mouth in the US in over 50
years. |
 |
Foot and
Mouth is no threat to people. |
 |
Foot and
Mouth is not a particularly deadly disease to animals either.
The mortality is very low. It causes mostly economic
losses due to treatment and slower growth. |
 |
During
the 2001 Foot and Mouth outbreak in the UK not a single person
was infected or harmed by the disease (no threat to people).
But 6.5 million animals were killed, most of them healthy,
because they were near the infected farms. The devastation
to family farms caused by the depopulation of the livestock and,
in some cases, burning of barns and infrastructure to dispose of
the bodies caused 80 farmers to commit suicide. |
Scrapies
 | Scrapie is a degenerative and eventually fatal disease
affecting the central nervous system of sheep and goats.
Its like mad cow disease in cattle. |
 |
There is
currently a voluntary scrapies program that has made great
headway in eliminating this disease in the US. Sheep in
this program are inspected and flocks certified scrapies free.
|
EIA
What the USDA is not telling you about NAIS is:
 | Despite having launched this massive program the USDA still
has NO IDEA how much it will cost. But they will say that
the costs will be born by the animal owners. |
 | Some NAIS opponents estimate the cost to be 3 to 5 times the
cost of the National Census every year. |
 | The cost of the 2000 National Census in the United States is
estimated to be $4.5 BILLION. That makes the estimated
cost of NAIS to be $13.5 to $22.5 BILLION every year. |
 | If you compare the cost of testing every slaughtered cow
over 30 months of age in the US - $500 Million - with the
low end estimated cost of tracking every animal's movement -
$13.5 Billion - it becomes pretty obvious that we should be
testing beef instead of tracking animals. When you add to
it that testing beef WOULD keep mad cow infected beef out of the
food supply while tracking animals DOES NOTHING toward keeping
mad cow infected beef out of the food supply then the choice
becomes really clear! Let's get real - what does tracking
horses back and forth from a horse show have to do with mad cow
disease? |
 | Large "confinement" producers will be allowed to provide one
ID for a large herd or flock rather than identify each
individual animal. While small farmers raising animals
under more natural conditions will be required to tag and track
each animal. Many small farmers believe this will put them
out of business. Many believe the USDA and their factory
farm producers intend this to be another consequence of the
program. |
When you get right down to it the REAL reason for NAIS is:
 | The NAIS program is being required by foreign trade
agreements with countries that buy our beef and pork.
|
 | From the
http://nonais.org/ web
site: "The reality is NAIS is about profits for large
factory farm meat exporters." |
 | That means little Jenny has to record every event in the
life of her 4H chicken just so a big beef conglomerate can sell
beef to Japan. Let the big beef conglomerate track their
animals and leave little Jenny alone! |
Animals affected that have to be ID'd and tracked:
* Cows
* Pigs
* Sheep
* Goats
* Horses and burros
* Llamas (and others)
* Deer (all domestic cervids)
* Chickens
* Turkeys
* Peafowl, guinea fowl, pheasants, quail, etc
* Rabbits
* Fish (trout, other stockpond fish)
All this sounds Orwellian when you first hear about it. And
many people have said "We would never implement something like that
in the US!" But since the USDA failed to push this through at the
National level they are now trying to push it through state by state.
Already Wisconsin and a couple other states have implemented it. There have
been incidents where people have been arrested for having six cows
and refusing to comply. The Colorado State Fair recently denied
letting 4H kids show and sell their animals unless they had a
premise ID.
NAIS is
being forced upon farmers and animals lovers without legislative
consideration or fair debate. Our fundamental Constitutional
rights that are violated by this program are not even being
considered. The USDA is recklessly plunging ahead with this
program without even doing a cost/benefit analysis - all the while
admitting they have no idea what the costs would be. Security
and privacy issues are being down played with over simplified plans
like having the database be managed by the "private sector".
The USDA is
talking out of both sides of their mouth when they say they need
NAIS to track disease and it can be managed. They are ALSO
saying it is not necessary to test all slaughtered cattle because
the risk of mad cow is so low. And they are saying they are
not going to require labeling of cloned meat because they "cannot
possibly track" all the cloned animals that enter the food supply.
Its ridiculous - either disease is a problem or its not.
Either tracking the millions upon millions of animals in the US is
feasible or its not. Which is it?
The argument
on cloned meat makes it even more clear to me the USDA is
implementing NAIS for its big factory farm producers. NAIS
would NOT require those producers to track each animal (they get to
have one ID and track a whole herd) - hence cloned animals would not
be identifiable. Why would you even consider putting a program
like NAIS in place and then not track (and label) the animals most
"questionable" in the minds of consumers?
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little
temporary
safety deserve neither liberty or safety. - Benjamin Franklin, 1759
"The reality is that politics involves itself with us whether we
like it or not. We can bury our heads in the sand and hope
that things don't get too bad, or we can fight back when government
treats us as its servant rather than its master." -
Ron Paul, 2007
Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must
be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or
one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children what it
was once like in the United States where men were free. -
Ronald Regan.
|
| |
|
 |
 







|

         |